Egotism ....a lifelong romance

Wednesday, August 17, 2005

Virtually speaking...

After almost two years of my debut as a blogger (thanks to my steadfast, and more importantly, cyber-competent pal, Atool,) that started with a revelation of the domination of the cyberworld in my life, I decided it was time for part II of my virtual reality deliberation.

I still maintain that the best scene in Disclosure is where Tom Sanders enters the virtual representation of his company’s database, and often wonder how it would be to have that option in real life --- plug in different situations in a computer program and look at cause and effect, or better still, experience a wide array of emotions and actions Matrix-style from a wire-entangled pod.

For a predominantly computer phobic person, I am unusually fascinated by the world of simulations, and AS a computer-phobic person I do think my mind does a better job of it.

Since I left my high school days behind me (where my biggest worry was usually along the lines of “Do I begin with the homework or finish reading ‘Doctors’?”), more often than not, my most promising moment of the day has been draping the comforter around me from anywhere between 12 and 3 am, shutting out the real world and getting lost in ‘the beyond’ of beautiful dreams.

You’re constantly hearing people talk about fulfilling their dreams and translating their fantasies into reality. I, for one, want quite a few of my dreams to stay a dream. Isn’t it more fun to dream a dream than live a dream?

Be it Enid Blyton’s “enchanted land” series, landing the A-6 intruder at New York’s Intrepid museum or “Back to the future” at Universal Studios, I’ve been quite happy in my closeted little world of illusions right from somewhere around age six to two decades later.

When it was time for the monthly family movie outing, my sis always wanted the depressingly real 1947-Earth, I wanted Speed where a bus could jump over freeways or Jurassic Park where dinosaurs could roam the earth. My favorite show on TV is the most feel-good and unrealistic of them all--- six Manhattan residents spending 24 hours a day in a coffee shop and still living in fancy apartments. It may not exactly scream “reality” but let’s face it, I wouldn’t sit in front of a celluloid screen if I just wanted to see day-to-day life on the street. My fire-escape allows an unbiased view :)

I don’t know if I’ll ever go on a treasure hunt through ten different countries and I’m pretty sure I won’t ever sell outrageously priced chocolates on the streets of New York, but I got it all by sitting glued to every wheezing breath in the first season of The Amazing Race and one too many acerbic remarks in The Apprentice.

A lot of times I feel more excited about plopping down on my couch and sitting down for a full hour of Real Time or three of a Wimbledon men’s final than about meeting up with a good friend or calling a long lost pal who would guaranty a few laughs.

Is it because anything could go wrong in an I-am-breathing-the-same-air-you-are relationship while the one on the small screen is protected not only by layers of nitrocellulose, but also from the callousness that destiny seems so eager to impose in real life? Is it less complicated and more rewarding to live lives “through our heads”?

Is it a milder (I hope!) version of multiple personality syndrome, where we constantly try to compartmentalize our lives into the “perfect virtual” ones and the “not-so-perfect real” ones?

Do we just want to keep these two worlds strictly apart, instead of trying to find a compromise that may result from an ineffective transposition? Are dreams just a way of overlooking the trials and tribulations of the harsh world out there?

Can we live our entire lives being happy and satisfied in the pristine uncorrupted world upstairs, never bringing them out into the very tainted real one that threatens to throttle them in infancy?

Michael Crichton and Steven Spielberg apart, can the virtual ever be real?

14 comments:

FSN 3.0 said...

I love the virtual world of my dreams because real life could never throw up such interesting scenarios and give it the perfect ending I see in my dreams. My dreams are sometimes so vivid that even when I wake up it takes me a while to stop living in them.

However, dont you think a tangible relationship with somebody real would be preferred to living in constant fantasies of some tall dark 6 foot stranger with a cleft in his chin, long hair, a villa in Paris coming down from his 80 foot yacht to sweep you off your feet? (I of course talk about those 20 somethings who never seem to be able to get off their Mills & Boon Swoons and look in the mirror)

I'd rather have somebody I can reach out and touch - whenever I want. Of course the odds of that happening are pretty remote - since they'd have to NOT be pissed off with me to allow that. :-)

There was this woman (on some TV show that I was flipping through) who wanted to be placed in a medicine-induced coma because her dream world was much more beautiful to her than the real world. She wanted to live it constantly.Isn't that taking it a little too far, though?

Anonymous said...

lol...for a guy, you seem to have a pretty vivid picture of what a girl dreams about ;)
absolutely! i'd much rather have it in real life than in the world of my dreams---only it's never so perfect in real life, is it? so this is stop-gap, so to speak. till it happens for real :)
while i'm at it, let me give ya a li'l piece of trivia about women (though i'm hardly the advocate on how women think ;))--- the tall dark handsome stranger only exists in the teen dream world. after that we are all about smart and funny :) it's you guys that have this one track minded obsession with beauty (not to mention stupidity, which is a pre-requisite)

also, in my dream/celluloid world i get to have many dream men (maher, federer, stewart, to name a few :)) can't do that in real life and get caught by the almighty, can we? ;)

this woman's for real? the one that wanted to live in her dreamworld ? or was it a soap? though, i must admit that's takin it a little too far, cos once you get too comfortable in your dream world, you dont make an attempt to ever try to make it happen in real life. but let's say it's a timed little journey---like going into a computer program and then getting back out in the real world. that'll be fun...and you can make as many journeys as you want...

FSN 3.0 said...

Some of the women I have spoken with(and I like speaking with them, and above all arguing :-) )
seem to still be stuck in a M&B rut.This 23 year old girl I was talking to,when I asked her what kind of guy she wants to end up with starts off thus" Broad shoulders, strong jaw..."

WHOA WHOA WHOA WHOA.They guy may be a deranged psychopath and you wouldn't care?

"Well as long as he loves ME..."

Er...

That's nothing. This 26 year old girl, American Indian, looks great, very intelligent - is rejecting potential matches because she wants somebody who's a 6 footer. What is it with women and 6 footers? Are they going to use the guy primarily to fetch boxes from the attic?

Dont you know why men want some body who's only drop dead gorgeous? Because if she were both good looking AND smart she'd start thinking she was too good for em..
:-)

However you know the old formula that guys keep complaining about

Beauty*Intelligence*Availability = AnC (Annoying Constant)

You dont have to worry about the almighty - just think of Him wanting you to be true to yourself....[I dont think you worry anyway]

If women will just figure out what they want and let us men know, the world would be a much better place.

In the immortal words of Jerry Seinfeld " I know I'm not going to understand women. I'll never understand how you can take boiling hot wax, pour it onto your upper thigh, rip the hair out by the root, and still be afraid of a spider"

That woman was on one of those Law-based TV shows, but the character itself was based on a real-life incident. Quirky ainnit?

Anonymous said...

there! that's why I had my disclaimer: i'm not the advocate on what women want (you might wanna ask mel gibson tho).
but all the girls i know (and it's safe to say i only know the smart ones with the right priorities ;)) seem to want men that are smart and funny and reasonably successful.
i dunno about this obsession with 6 footers; that means indian girls pretty much need to remain single. i myself prefer the step ladder though, it's a whole lot more reliable, if you know how to fold it right ;)

naah, i still dont understand the deal with the gorgeous--- what if she's smart and not good looking? guys are still intimidated. but if she's pretty and dumb, that's alright. cos she's not intruding their domain.

the problem is men never know what women want and women always know what guys want --- the less the requirements the easier it is to figure it out.

that equation doesnt make sense to me though (and not jus cos I'm awful at math). actually there's lotsa women who are smart and beautiful --- the problem is that if the girl is pretty noone's listening to her (or she aint talkin --the W3 phenomenon all over again) and if she is smart and airing her opinions all the time, the guys are so disgusted with her they dont care if she is good lookin or not. about availability, i wouldn't know, but i plan to do an analysis if i ever decide to turn gay...

hehe dat seinfeld quote is bang on target :D

FSN 3.0 said...

That's my point though - IF they are smart AND good looking, then some guy has already started sowing his oats in the field.

Most of the women I see who DO have the looks & brains keep flaunting both, which gets to be a real big pain in the behind.

Would it help if us menfolk made huge 124 sized fonts which proclaim "I ACCEPT YOU'RE SMART- PLEASE DONT CHARGE ME TO BREATHE THE SAME AIR AS YOU".

Also, it depends on which REALM they are smart at. Most women seem to have no interest in talking about politics or sports.Many ladies of today, even take great pride in having never picked up a book, or a newspaper.

Fine so lets talk about ideas, dreams and inspirations.
Nope.
They want to sit there and tell us what happened in their day, in 2 minute intervals.So while pretending to listen, the guy have to have something to look at or dream about.
This is where the good looks come in.

The guy can dream about the girl's good looks, the girl can continue to flood him in a tirade of boring non-details and when they're both done, they could maybe get down to something productive.

Its also hard to have a sensible discussion with many women because after a point they'll start yelling, screaming crying or cussing. How am I expected to drive home my point if I have to be worried about getting cussed at for ruining their mascara? [Dont mean to be patronizing - just talking from experience]

I think nature eventually finds a balance (Dr.Grant in Jurassic Park, "Nature always finds a way")and that balance is as things stand today.

Glad you liked the quote. Will that perhaps make you appreciate "The greatest TV show ever" ?

Anonymous said...

yeah---that i'll grant you...most women dont know anything of politics or sports. And yes, those that do, do want to charge you for the air you breathe, but let's face it, they are so rare, i think they are entitled :) after all, women take more credit than men for everything they do, simply cos it's so baffling when a woman does ANYthing right.

yeah, those that flaunt their good looks are annoying, but those that flaunt intelligence have no choice, cos with women there's a presumption that they wouldn't know, so they've gotta not only make their point but sear it right through you ;). Hell, I have that presumption about women, why wouldn't the men!

Memo: women that are smart dont talk about jus their day to day life! that's not the smart women you're talkin about.

Nature sure has found a balance--men laugh and women cry, and both of them yell (dare ya stick dat widda females), but the trick is to keep going amid the tears and the decibels, cos the argument is all-important :D

lol, greatest tv show indeed; you'd have to ban Friends for that, and there's still Frasier and S&TC. talkin of tv shows, the best one ever is re-starting tomorrow -Maher's real time at 11pm ET. i betcha he's more entertaining that seinfeld even when he's asleep :D

FSN 3.0 said...

Friends? HELL NO!

Friends stopped being funny after the 5th season, and they kept dragging it and squeezing it until every last little drop had been broken down into its atoms...

Frasier & S&TC are funny no doubt..but IMHO they cannot even come close to a show about 'nothing'. Think about the material that Seinfeld had to work on - everyday incidents and happenings.

Frasier got distinctly un-funny after Niles & Daphne got together, S&TC got boring after Miranda got her baby & Charlotte started hanging with that chrome-dome guy. It wasn't about Sex or the City anymore. I used to love Friends when I was like 20, but now its just ridiculously corny, and Lisa Kudrow just makes me sick.Its dangerous for me to watch "The Comeback" because im afraid of losing my dinner.I only watch the later seasons because the romantic inside me likes the Monica-Chandler relationship a lot...and I always thought Courtney Cox was the hottest of the 3.

I have watched Jerry Seinfeld and I must say he is TRULY The master of stand up comedy. He doesn't have to resort to a single swear word - no shaking his booty or yelling copulation-related-obscenities (I love Chris Rock & people of that genre, but Seinfeld is in a class of his own)

Bill Maher gets his point across - but he needs to resort to too much of cussing , and it brings a smile to my face but stops short of making me roll on the ground.[However I do understand that he's trying to discuss issues - not merely make people laugh, even so..]

Take a moment and watch Jerry Seinfeld on Broadway: I'm telling you for the last time.

I can't think of any other show other than Seinfeld where literally every line becomes a quote.The plots are phenomenal - reminds me of P.G Wodehouse, just the way everything comes together at the end of a half-hour episode.

Post-It Sticky: Look at almost any woman in a relationship - they seem to want to discuss the entire happenings of their day. It maybe events, or whatever the woman was thinking, but it is definitely a complete account, which the man usually doesn't want to listen to, in its entirety.

The 'smart women' never seem to be balanced. Either they are gung-ho vigilantes for female justice, prowling the streets looking for concentration centers of testosterone to fry with their flamethrowers, or like I said they need to keep 'searing it' through the men again and again.

Y'know who the truly smart women are? The ones who let the men think they're smarter, and end up getting their way anyway. You simply gotta be smart enough to see things as they are.

You are right- some women know how to handle themselves and not get into the whole yelling thing - but again it comes down to where they're flaunting it and it gets annoying.

I agree that the argument is the most important thing - but sometimes women get too personal. Can they not compartmentalize issues? If we're yelling about an issue, then its the issue thats to blame and our differences. Instead it ends up getting personal all of a sudden - and then you're in no mans land.I dont want to end up being chased by some pre-menstrual nut case on a big dose of rage.

With guys - we can yell our heads off (usually will happen in a Schumacher Vs the world argument)but can forget all about it in a while..and go back to where we were.

Karthika said...

ok, my respect for the male sex just went up about three notches when you said Courtney Cox is the hottest of the three (lest i come of as the feminist I am not, I usually give the male sex too much credit in most matters, except in their choice of women). ALL the men i know think aniston is the hottest and I keep wondering if a woman has to always be totally helpless and confused for men to look at her as a woman.

As for Friends, I have no basis for liking the sitcom-- i dont think its hilarious, i dont think its smart, and its certainly not "real"; it just makes me feel good and a DVD of Friends has never failed to deliver when i need lightening up. Yeah, ideally it should be for the 20 year old and it was for me, but that IS the reason i still watch it; It's jus one of those things that remind you of better times, no matter what. yep, the chandler-monica relationship is the most romantic and the only thing realistic about it :)

btw, I do like Seinfeld. In fact I think Seinfeld and Raymond are the most realistic of sitcoms; they make day-to-day life very funny. And Jerry Seinfeld is one of my favorite comedians. In fact somethin on my to-do list for a while has been watching one of his live stand-ups. Ditto on the swear words. I wouldn't watch Chris Rock or chappelle if they paid me to watch them. I absolutely adore elaine and I actually identify with her character a lot.

Frasier and S&TC of course are the most "elite" of the sitcoms.

Yes, Maher is one of the few people that can combine "getting a million points across" while being incredibly funny. most people lose out on one or the other: conan doesnt convey anything, leno/letterman become serious when they are discussing issues and stewart errs on the side of conveying less and laughing more. And on his show Maher hardly curses though he overdoes it on his stand-ups.

hmmm....seinfeld and PGW; never heard that one before, but since you seem to have done a PhD on the subject, I'll give you the benefit of the doubt.

yep, I agree most women are no fun to argue with; they have too many issues. you may think differently bcos you're a guy, but its best to "agree to disagree" with them...the men are much more fun :) but believe me, it's by no means generic. I know a lot of men who take arguments very personally; my religion-related arguments have caused many a man his composure. But of course, being a girl, I get away with it...not fair, but the world is an unfair place :D

FSN 3.0 said...

Chris Rock & Chapelle are funny- but its a sort of forced funny. Doesn't quite flow as easily as it does for Jerry Seinfeld. If you get a chance I'd recommend you watch "I'm telling you for the last time" - his stand up act from Broadway. I just watched it recently and I never stopped laughing.

I think Leno is geuninely funny as well - whereas Letterman is more cynical. Jon Stewart cracks me up, and Conan doesn't need any jokes to make me laugh.I can't watch him for too long though - but I love some of his bits: Courage the Insult Comic Dog, Celebrities talking through satellite and Walker, Texas Ranger clips.

I haven't really watched Maher's show - but his stand-up act was a tad overboard on the profanity.

I can see how you can do that to some men :-).Might be interesting to watch you take somebody apart--from a safe distance, of course.

Anonymous said...

yeah, i absolutely adore the ones with the celebrities (more like politicians) through satellite on conan, esp dubya and kerry. and insult, the comic dog of course---the most self possessed character on earth, he put oreilly to shame once :D
conan is one of those unconditional humors---he doesnt need to be smart or witty, he jus makes you laugh :)
but my allegiance is still to Maher, despite the fact that he absolutely messed up his first show in three months by inviting that moron, chris rock --smart humor and witless humor jus dont mix!
ok, will take your suggestion on the jerry seinfeld stand up...

FSN 3.0 said...

I was watching Real Time last night - and vaguely recall watching it before.

I did wonder what Chris Rock was doing - did you notice that nobody was even taking him seriously?

"I guess I'll ride my mexican in to work tomorrow"

That was hilarious, though.

Is it on every week?

The problem with inviting comedians to serious discussions is that they will try to turn everything into a joke and it gets annoying after a while.

The best on Conan's satellite linkup IMO are Arnold, Dubya and Tom Cruise (That is absolutely hilarious). Btw it was Triumph, the insult comic dog (Courage is the cowardly dog)

Anonymous said...

good call on the 'IMO' --- cos i doubt your opinions are "humble" :D
oh yes, Triumph...he's adorable. methinx he is more popular than conan.
i dunno courage though.
yep real time is on every friday at 11 till he takes that pointless summer break in june :(
What better to do on a Friday night than sit down and be awestruck at Bill :)

FSN 3.0 said...

Why does Real Time air on Friday Nights?

Do all Libertarians sit at home watching tv at 11 on a Friday night?- Even if it is to watch Bill Maher?

How does a night out on the town getting hammered sound?

Not that I particularly subscribe to that school of thought - its not too bad every once in a while.

Maybe Bill will be as funny on TiVo :-)

Anonymous said...

tv's jus bein kind to me cos Stewart airs at the same time on the other days of the week...

btw getting hammered on friday night IS the thing to do till you can afford HBO :D
but you know what's even better: a beer-bill party at home. both get ya high and happy :)

FYI, there's a Real time re-run on saturday nights.