Egotism ....a lifelong romance

Wednesday, December 14, 2005

Fun with matrimonial dot-commers

When you’re a single desi girl in your late twenties (yeah, officially began on the “late” a couple months ago, a fact everyone in my family seems to be bothered by but me), your parents invariably try to get you to agree to tie that proverbial knot and nothing is going to deter them except, well, another girl of nuptial age, or maybe, just maybe, another girl of nuptial age, cos let’s face it, among the ferocious cyclones and the threat of dengue and the relentless power-cuts, marriage of their incorrigible daughters in alien lands seems to be the singular problem bogging down Indian mid-lifers.

So, if you’re unfortunate enough to be in the subcontinent, they keep foisting on you that good-natured (uh-oh), decent, well-educated guy from that family of good upbringing, who, by the way, did clear the background check (I am not sure what that entails but as far as I can tell, it’s not along the lines of hobbies or favorite foods) till you finally cave in and agree – after all it’s just your marriage and you’re only going to spend the rest of your life with the guy, nothing major. If you’re lucky enough to have an ocean or two between you, however, your parents learn to be a little more creative, namely, resort to that thing that makes the world a tinier place, and usually has a dot-com at the end of it.

And in order to humor your folks (not to mention a certain tangible fear that began to surface when you found yourself single at age 25 and 2 days, and has grown progressively since, not totally unaided by parent-instilled paranoia) you register at one of the online sites. There’s a wide range to choose from, thanks to Indian ingenuity and cyber-competence, not to mention the fastidiousness of ‘single-and-looking’ desis, who seem a tad pickier (as evidenced by the universal dropdown tab, including yes, no, maybe & don’t know for everything from vegetarianism to spirituality), contrary to the parents that are ruled by criteria totally unrelated to living in this day and age; for one, they don’t seem to be able to translate “good, clean, habits” to “forget ever going to a sports bar or night club.”

So, more for the ‘heck of it’, your love of writing (and parents) and amusement with anything foreign to your character, than any real belief that you’re going to find a potential life partner this way, you use your writing skills to their articulate best and put up a rambling, descriptive profile, that includes everything from your ’90s awe of Pete Sampras to your current radically libertarian views and believe it or not, find a pastime quite unlike any you’ve ever dreamed of (unlike that all-important man you’re looking for, who surfaces every so often).

Shaadi.com becomes one of your daily internet stops, and you soon find yourself accommodating it between the more routine ones like gmail and blogspots and bbc-world. Because, despite the sitcoms and late night comedies and the incredibly stupid republicans out there, you are still looking for something to add to your repertoire of daily laughter – duly fulfilled by the guy that comes “from a very close knit family with lots of values”, the one that is “garnished with positive aura”, the fella that is looking “for a nice lady that is loving to her parents and family” or the father that wants a daughter-in-law “preferably in the IT field” (you do give him the benefit of doubt and wonder if the guy has trouble differentiating between linux and unix, and feel a pang of pain that you don’t qualify).

If you’re fortunate, you have a small clique of single, strictly-25-or-older, female friends that you either talk into registering (in the rare case that their parents were less militant than average and haven’t been initiated yet) or better still, share your password with, so they can join in the fun as well. After all, other than the occasional federer-fervor or matrix-obsession, they fit your profile to a tee (let’s face it, they’re not single and 25-or-older and desi and female for nothing).

And then it happens. Your pal forwards you a Shaadi.com profile and you read it in its entirety. You’re stumped. You re-read it, lest you missed something the first time. Again, nothing. Now you get a little worried – you either lost your sense of humor or your grammatical authority – both, in your opinion, utterly precious to your qualifications as a human being. On the third reading, still coming up with nothing and slightly short of breath, you shoot her an email: Relatively well-read and well-informed, inclined to both sports and politics, decent sense of humor, near-equal weightage to the couch and the outdoors, likes food and the television, and even the English is almost flawless....What is up with that?

And then you spot it. The guy has a damn cat. You haven’t lost it after all. You burst out laughing. Now, a rotty would be dandy. A lab, glorious. A golden retriever, just about perfect. But a cat?

There’s a reply from her almost immediately (she’s single and desi after all ;)).

I know you will beat me up for this.. but that guy in the profile seemed really your type... (esp since he named his cat SPUNKIE)

Now you’re really outraged. She’s drunk the cool-aid!
You could put the spunkie in bold black letters, alright, but I still hear the cat a whole lot louder....

And now, having irrevocably jeopardized my chances of ever finding anyone on shaadi.com, I’ll go back and see if someone missed an all-important comma.

All said, this is not so much out of the cynicism or arrogance that comes with being single, but rather that all-essential, self-disparaging and healthy laughter you need to have with your female friends when you find yourself unattached beyond a certain age....No offense to shaadi.com and the dozen earnest matchmaking sites out there, which would, no doubt, allow a simpler human being find her soulmate and live happily ever after. And to be totally fair, I find it hard to resist a smile when I chance upon a fellow Maher-worshipper or the guy that proclaims to watch tennis with the same nail-biting fervor that seats me on the precarious edge of a sofa through Wimbledon, or turn off when another doesn’t share my penchant for Crichton or T-bone steak.

I am just a little more romantic than a feeble attempt at trying to fit my characteristics on a pre-designed template...and expecting someone to even begin to imagine a lifetime with me based on it... a few hours at dinner, maybe, a couple hour-long phone calls, sure, a 10,000-odd word email, absolutely...

But a page-long description with my co-ordinates and occupation and dietary habits? I’m a little more complicated than that.....I wouldn’t be doing justice to myself....or a potential suitor....

23 comments:

AN said...

LOL. You hit the nail here...echoes my sentiments. I cannot speak for 20-something gals obviously, but a lot of these situations can be mapped to the life and times of 20-something guys as well. However, I believe, many of these 'applicants' do have an interesting character of their own and don't necessarily fall under the 'pre-designed template' category. Unfortunately, they are either strictly under the watchful eye of their parents, or have hidden talents but aren't inclined to come up with a template that reflects their ability to think/write independently and provide a different/unique perspective on their life and character because of parental-control. ;)

Hmmm...as for a dinner date - not too bad, couple-hour long phone calls - sorry machaan! (or whatever the applicable word is for the female species)...10,000 word emails - Bring Them On.

Karthika said...

you're right. a lot of the 'intriguers' (rebel/ intense/ philosophical/blacksheep/sarcastic/ scornful ;)) get camoflaged in these templates esp ones that use annoying degrees like 'not, somewhat and very' very losely indeed. and i do think "doesn't matter" needs to be changed to "i give a rat's ass" :D

naah, i dont even mean so much a dinner date (i hate labels, esp ones that cos you to want to look good or act cultured or fit a dress-code) -- actually more like dinners where you are out with people you are just getting to know and then strike up an interesting conversation...
yeah, i am not all comfortable with bell's invention myself, cos it goes somethin like "so what else is happening" after the first five minutes of "so what's up" but there have been 4-hour-long conversations i have had with people when the topic gets a little more interesting than "it's cold" -- religion, ayn rand, the death penalty, yesteryears, you name it....

emails and chat windows still rank among the top in my "getting to know a person" modes cos that's when you are at your philosophical, profound and candid best :)

plus you dont have to worry about that awkward silence or the waiter walking in on your "that's what's wrong with the world" conversation.

memo: 20-something --- VERY different from 25-or-older! At 20, I still thought I'd recognize the guy by his shining armor :D

Anonymous said...

Hehe shining armour...actually by 20-something, I did mean >= 25. Yeah, its funny how merely the concept of an email or a chat conversation inspires me to add much more clarity to my thoughts, compared to phone calls or face-to-face conversations.

FSN 3.0 said...

Guy with a cat- reminds me of Jon (The evergreen creation of Jim Davis, and literally owned by his more popular creation - Garfield). Of course he might have been confessing his love por fussy.

One of my old roomies is currently using shaadi.com as a hookup site [He used to be socially inept] and now swears by it.

Of course his misplaced 'confidence' leads him to consistently bloat his profile beyond any resemblance to his actual personality.

Finally a word from the Master:

Jerry Seinfeld on dinner dates. "What is a dinner date but a job interview that lasts all night"

"At the end of the interview - you (the girl) know if we (the guy)are going to get lucky or not."

Why Katrix, dont you believe in love by email...getting to know the person , getting to know their heart....etc etc :-)?

Karthika said...

hehe, i used to love garfield, but had to do a quick wikipedia to find out that davis had 25 cats. yikes!
there's somethin about men with cats that screams gay (yeah i did say i dont like labels, but usually only the ones that are not invented by me ;))

ironically enough, I believe in online relationships -- i am not very socially-adept myself (other than the very saccharine 'how are ya' but people can see through that in the next 10 minutes or so) and I also do share your demi-god's view on the very conventional method of lookin for potential lifepartners. you're never ever yourself on a 'date'. plus, I really do need to go at the steak with my bare hands, if you know what i mean :)

and i think it's in front of the celluloid screen that you're as uninhibited as it gets. when you've discussed everything from spirituality to cartoons, it's surprisingly easy to strike up a conversation at the dinner table. plus, it's an incredible screening process :)

the problem with sites like shaadi.com is that they are ALREADY labeled -- you dont begin as an acquaintance, grow to be a friend and then see where it can go. you start with a "potential" lifepartner and it can only be downhill from there. And as with everything else, bcos of the label, you try to reflect your best side, which isnt necessarily real...if only everybody learnt to say "i'm bad" like i can :)

Anonymous said...

Dont have much time to exchange emails on the comment section - but well kudos Katrix!!! You've got spunk ;)...
simple girls - soulmate- happily ever after- wake up girl.. all three dont exsist , except in Fairyland maybe, to which we will never gain admission. ASk a married person and they wud call u delusioned.

We are just wired wrong !!!
But thanks, your blog comes a close second to the shaadi profiles..in making me smile..

Anonymous said...

on an entirely different note - the concept of precis writing has been wiped out by blogging.
Vee

Karthika said...

trust Vee, my cynical yet sensible pal, to be sure to bring me to terra firma when i am out building castles in the air ;)

but i do think the simple girl is entitled to the kinda happiness you or I will never be...happiness is but illusory and if you can "see" the happiness where none exists that's all life is really about...

the ingenious matrician concept all over again...

you're right, the blogosphere offers the limitless (and tolerant) space my very loud opinions sometimes need.

Karthika said...

not to mention the "hubble" concept of sex-&-the-city fame....

FSN 3.0 said...

For those of us who dont quite follow concepts from Sex and the City (Seinfeld by itself encompasses all of creation), could you kindly enunciate on the "hubble" concept?

I dont quite like the chat-first-meet-later kind of online relationship.

Its sort of like watching your favorite book as a movie and being thoroughly disappointed when what you had in your head doesn't look quite the same on screen.

You "get to know a person" using these "remote sensing" vehicles such as email/IM/Matrimonial sites and you'll then end up painting a picture of them in your head. Sure, you have pictures. The whole story, pictures do not tell.Believe only our eyes, we must.

I feel that there's nothing quite like getting to know a person face-to-face and learning about them through live audiovisual feedback.

Plus..its a great way to see if you have the spark, the chemistry and if the other person can really turn you on.

Coz..lets face it...nobody wants to keep conversing or getting to know each other all the time.

There be a time for howlin and there be a time for lovin

Karthika said...

And there I sat thinking that you were the advocate on SATC ;) the hubble concept is a reference the girls make to the ‘70s chick flick -- the way we were. When Big gets engaged to Natasha, the girls’ theory is that carrie is too complicated for him; he just needed a simple girl. And I totally agree with that cos I have seen it firsthand: most men don’t seem to want to deal with a girl that thinks and philosophizes and contemplates; it’s all good for a friend but when it comes to a relationship, the easier they are, the better.

Yeah – I know what you mean by the “painting too good a picture” thing. It almost always looks more amazing in the head :) there’s something about human imagination....

But obviously I don’t mean that would be my first option– if I met intriguing guys while crossing the street, I don’t think email or chat would even figure...but you gotta admit the internet truly does make the world a tinier place and your choices that much wider. (And I am the original proponent of choice :)) And personally, I’d rather know the guy’s intelligent and philosophical and then find out there’s no spark, than feel the spark and then find out he’s a dud I have nothing to discuss with (though that rarely happens cos intelligence is an integral part of the spark)....

Also, in my experience, it is very rarely that a conversation gets more profound than the weather or the latest movie over dinner...takes about 10 sittings to get there (unless its people you know very well, of course). I think I have discussed deeper things with you on a blog comment window than I have with some flesh and blood people I’ve gotten to know over the past half a year. It depends on the individual as well, but there is something about this medium of conversation that instigates abstract thought, don’t ya think?

Karthika said...

FS, I am lookin at Seinfeld in new light after hearing one of the absolute truths from the very despicable george costanza on an episode today -- "I don't want hope. Hope is killing me. My dream is to become hopeless”.

I think hope is over-rated in today’s world, cos hope is slowly killing human beings. If hope were eradicated from the world, people would just accept that something is not going to happen and move on. As long as hope is around, they hope and they hope and they hope and then they die without getting what they hope for (and I think a very similar role is played by God as well – namely, the promise without the delivery)....

FSN 3.0 said...

I hate to cross the impeccable lines of Seinfeld, but I'll have to reference the tagline for my most favorite movie of all time "The Shawshank Redemption".
"Fear may hold you prisoner, but hope will set you free".

Sometimes, hope is all you have left. You may be in prison, waiting to serve out your time or you may be doing your best in something and have nothing else to go on with.

George Costanza is an interesting character. He's my favorite and I consider him the best character developed for any show on television :-).

Also, let me give you the FULL QUOTE and context.

This is a conversation between Jerry Seinfeld and George Costanza in "The Fix-Up".

G : "I don't want hope. Hope is killing me. My dream is to become
hopeless. When you're hopeless you don't care. And when you
care, that indifference makes you attractive."
J : "So, hopelessness is the key?"
G : "It's my only hope."

They are discussing George's inability to meet and be able to talk to attractive women.George says he's going to give up trying [but the deeper meaning resonates that he merely wants to APPEAR that way]. He also says that he wants to try to appear indifferent, because he thinks that will make him attractive to women.

You can't pull the golden words out of context...

So you see, even in hopelessness there's still hope (according to him).

At the end of the episode, he does find out that there is still hope for him. This is actually a really funny episode that highlights George's character to perfection.

George gets fixed up with Elaine's friend Cynthia , who doesn't really like him.However they end up doing it and even though George uses protection they were defective and Cynthia misses her cycle.

So they others are discussing that cynthia may be pregnant from just a casual encounter:

Elaine: I knew those condoms were defective!

Jerry: How did you know they were defective?!

George walks in.

Elaine: ....Because! Because she missed her period!

George: She missed her period? Oh my god. I can't believe it!

I'm a father!

I did it! My boys can swim! I can do it! I can do it!

He runs out screaming hysterically.
:-))))))))))))))))))))

Karthika said...

Sorry about taking the golden Seinfeld-en lines out of context, but you’re kinda guilty of the same crime you accuse me of.

Hope is great, hope is victorious, hope is virtue – but only when you can dig an inch of tunnel each day with a rockhammer for 20 years and escape to mexico and build a boat and live happily ever after. The Shawshank Redemption is one of my favorite movies as well, cos of the message it conveys. Namely, it’s great to have hope, when there IS hope.

But you cant always take that message and put it in the context of real life, where some situations truly are devoid of a single sliver of light. In other words is there a point in having hope in an absolutely hopeless situation? When you know that there is no light at the end of the tunnel in no uncertain terms, it’s good to jus forego the hope and get on with the rest of your life...

FSN 3.0 said...

What if there is no hope to continue living? If every individual were to, at some point of time just let go and decide life wasn't worth it?

We'd have a whole bunch of dead folks is what we'd have.

Andy doesn't know at the outset if he could dig through, but in addition to holding on to hope, he was also able to see opportunity when it presented itself.

Maybe hope means believing that there is indeed a way out and keeping your eyes open for it.

Karthika said...

i am not against hope per se -- i am all for the andy-kinda hope that MAKES you move toward your goal; without hope, you're right, we'd all be dead.

what i am against is blind hope - which, like blind faith - is illogical and irrational and makes you hold onto a belief that is very obviously a lost cause. Also, this stunts human perseverance and prevents him from looking at eggs in other baskets, cos he is too busy hanging onto one.

FSN 3.0 said...

Yup. I agree with you on that.Blind hope and blind faith are misplaced indeed.

I doubt Andy could have done what he did or held on to hope if he'd been in Red's cell instead :-).Although you never know - he might have found another way of doing it.

However in a day and age where people too easily highlight the negative, I will hold on to such inspirations as and when they come.

Karthika said...

gee, so now we agree? bummer :(

FSN 3.0 said...

Well it had to happen sometime, I guess.

:-))

Anonymous said...

Heee. K i wish i had the patience to read all the comments posted......I dont. but i have to say for some one who is going thro the trials and tribulations of match making.....i plan to write a book. 100 things not to say or mention if u wanna find a partner for life.
well i think finding a partner is an incomplete experiment....once u find him or her the search ends......isnt that a scary thought. :)
I think the most hilarious option i have see on matrimonial dot coms is "moderate family values" what the heck am i supposed to get from that?

Anonymous said...

V, which got you stymied - "moderate" or "family values"? :))
I think it shud be personal values, which extends to every other aspect of your life ( unless you are a hypocrite).
On that note, you guys should take a look at this link

http://www.selfcounseling.com/help/personalsuccess/personalvalues.html


It tells you what matters most to you.

Anonymous said...

http://www.selfcounseling.com/help/
personalsuccess/personalvalues.html

Karthika said...

v, do you realize what an asset i'd be for your book - "100 things not to say or mention if u wanna find a partner for life." jus pick EVERY line i've ever said and bam, you have a bestseller :D

moderate family values is the most hilarious?!! I must say you need some coaching on picking out the funniest bits. but i see where you're coming from...why do i care about your family values? (like a-gal says). or -- what do you mean by "moderate"? where am I on that scale? ;)

a-gal, i ditto you on personal values -- though do you realize you and i would be left without a word to describe it? ;)

this is exactly what i was afraid of. now my blog is referencing self-help sites? I might as well write a tribute to Dr. Phil :(