Egotism ....a lifelong romance

Wednesday, June 23, 2004

When the going gets tough, the tough make it tougher

[Ever seen that kid hunched over like a Neanderthal, carrying an all-important bag of books? That is one of the reasons why –to borrow from Ross Geller of Friends---evolution is still just a theory. Here’s unleashing one of the Katrician pearls of philo….]


'There has been no play so far on Day 3 of The Championships due to rain. It is hoped that some play will be possible today'.

That's what the Wimbledon site said. If I had had the luxury of staying home and watching it on TV like last year (thank god for qualifying exams), I would have seen a bunch of people running across the court with tarpaulin sheets in the desperate hope that human speed can actually counter the relentlessly falling droplets of rain sent from high above.

After much thought, I have hit upon this theory that man does like to make life tougher for himself (like it needs any toughening) and then he hopes that things came easier; masochism and hope are the two half brothers of man's constant struggle for existence and sustenance.

Taking my Wimbledon example to a point where it becomes just short of excruciatingly, painstakingly long-drawn, all the authorities at the all-England lawn tennis club need have done is have a retractable roof. In this day and age of supercomputers and microchips and micro micro micro chips (for want of a more techno savvy term), surely it is possible to have a roof over a center court that harbors ten thousand people for three weeks (or twenty five weeks depending on each year's respective rain delay) every June?

But we should give Center Court due credit. It seems pretty far advanced in comparison to Flushing Meadows, where they have two-dozen workers on their hands and knees wiping the courts with towels and blowers. Quite ironical in a land where people spend hours picking out the best fitting covers for their cell phones, I must say.

But I have a theory for that as well: I think Americans have a serious problem with tarpaulin (believe me, I don’t think the French or bin Laden even come close). Tell me, ingenious devices as snow scrapers are, wouldn't you rather just cover your car with a tarpaulin sheet and remove it the next time you resumed driving (not that in the blinding snow shower it makes a whole lot of difference whether you actually remove it)? If the concept of tarpaulins had hit this country, my room mate and I wouldn't have been perilously close to losing our fingers to frost bite during those famed Colorado blizzards. No, I wasn't here for the BIG one ---I can still count up to ten on my hands. (In case you are wondering, my brain simply doesn't work beyond two).

Then there are the vegetarians. I think they spend more time looking at the menu card than eating the one item that they ultimately hit upon with vindication comparable to the look on Bush's face the day Saddam was captured. I have tried telling them that the chickens and the cows are going to get killed anyway; if not, man would die of starvation. Don't the principles of statistics and probability mean squat to these people? The little I have retained from high school probability is sufficient to surmise that the option of one item out of ten thousand in 1000000000000000000 days of your life is a surefire route to insanity.

Oh, and yes-- the religious zealots. These are perhaps the most creative masochists. They range from people that stay without a morsel of food or a drop of water for days on end to those that camp outside the Alabama State judicial building to protest a piece of stone being wheeled out to those that demolish the Babri Masjid. Then there are, of course, the ones that fly planes into skyscrapers. Not to mention the opposite end of the spectrum that spends millions of hours and bucks contesting court cases because their kids have to listen to other kids say "Under God".

And all this in the name of 'He' who either doesn't exist, or if he does, is himself wondering how your cutting down on carbs might fetch you that all important grade. Now, about those inches around your waist, neither man nor God is really sure. But you might wanna ask Atkins.

A group of very interesting characters in the subset of human masochists I think are students. They, by far, take the most circuitous routes to reach seemingly straightforward goals (not literally of course--that's my area of expertise). For instance, they insist on carrying ten tons in their backpacks when the school has so thoughtfully provided metal lockers for the purpose (and they will dutifully carry their baggage WHEREever they go); their favorite place to crack math problems is a coffee bar that plays music at decibel levels at least two times more than that recommended for the human ear. And any amount of explanation that music distracts the brain falls on deaf ears (and for good reason).

And I am not even going to go into details of those that vacuum the same area of the carpet for two hours, seemingly seeing a grain of dirt that is not visible under the electron microscope, those that hand wash and air dry their clothes because of longevity (I wonder if the longevity of clothes matters when your own longevity is fast decreasing) and then those others that insist on going well under 50 mph on the highway because about ten years ago someone they knew got a speeding ticket (the idea that speed limits in the last decade might have been different does not even occur). Not to leave out the ones that stand at the crossing for an hour waiting for the “walk” sign to appear. The last time I read about it, walking was a voluntary action. And I certainly have to mention the hypochondriacs that clench their stomach and their fists in agony but wouldn't take that all-important pill because their great grand fathers predicted two hundred thousand years ago that medicine invented in the 20th century is 'bad' for you.

The most interesting group of masochists IMHO are the environmentalists; yeah, these are the ones that blow up tons of concrete in the name of saving a few trees from destruction. And then they go and destroy research labs (here, I am with them--it's not just the experimental animals they are saving, believe me); they are also the ones you'll see cutting the paper towel in half at that corner of the table, or to take it a little further, licking their hands (If it's the barbecue sauce on the spicy buffalo wings, however, I'd ditch the paper towel too--- not literally---cos then the green men will be after my life).

14 comments:

Anonymous said...

Hehe. That was a good blog after a long time. Keep them coming Ms. Rand...

Anonymous said...

wazzit a 'good' blog after a long time or a good 'blog' after a long time? ;) world of difference. anywayz, a compliment if ever there was one.

Anonymous said...

So much for compliments
Well let's just say it was a well 'written' blog after a long time. Does that make sense?

Anonymous said...

what is this chat central?

Anonymous said...

u let the steam out pal...wat (and when) next !!! I am with u on vegetarians.. wonder how many of them can resist leather accessories.Tarpaulins..hehe ... God bless America!!!

Anonymous said...

gee, sid---u otta know better than anyone else what this is-- an attempt to exaggerate the popularity of my blog :D
a month ago this section was dangerously close to being renamed 'comments by sid'

Anonymous said...

the magic of wimbledon and flushing meadows is the so called " ball boys/gals"...a flavor of the past....it shud linger. let somethings be untouched by technology. ;)
second...not all vegetarians refrain from meat to save the world....not me anyway. food i believe is a form of perception...the red pill.....its wat u want it to be.....:D
alrite the truth is i am a masochist! its the illusion that every job done is worth the effort......call it false...but atleast i have a paradise.

Anonymous said...

yup, happiness is but illusory, vidy, agre with u on that; but if 'extra effort' (esp unwieldy effort) were the secret to it, i wonder at cell phones and hi speed internet and gene chips. let's jus go back to the old stone age and hunt animals (though the vegetarians might have a problem with that ;)). yup, happiness is but illusory, vidy, agre with u on that; but if 'extra effort' (esp unwieldy effort) were the secret to it, i wonder at cell phones and hi speed internet and gene chips. let's jus go back to the old stone age and hunt animals (though the vegetarians might have a problem with that ;)). yup, happiness is but illusory, vidy, agre with u on that; but if 'extra effort' (esp unwieldy effort) were the secret to it, i wonder at cell phones and hi speed internet and gene chips. let's jus go back to the old stone age and hunt animals (though the vegetarians might have a problem with that ;)).

Anonymous said...

illusion or not.......a masochist finds and knows wat happiness is.......i am happy...u may not think so.....thats ur thot...hold on to it lady ;)

Anonymous said...

u guys are just weird

Anonymous said...

K,
i have to agree with the "easiest route" approach. my motto is
"find me a copter that will set me on top of everest, and i will scale it in a jiffy":-)
but please explain how the randian philosphoy gells with the "non-masochist" approach?
it seems to me that rand has subjected herself to the most brutal form of torture possible "being objective"!!

Anonymous said...

bein objective is tortorous---that's a first!
dee, lemme get this straight-- the concept of man's own happiness being the moral purpose of his life, unhindered by emotions and factors other than his own passions and achievements is actually tortorous? wouldn't you rather say that is the simplest, easiest form of living?

Anonymous said...

passion and achievement <=> objectivity - now thats a first!
K,
thats a stretch even for a sophist! in any case...
"man's own happiness being the moral purpose of his life, unhindered by emotions and factors other than his own passions and achievements" - absolutely.

Anonymous said...

*retract*
gee, ok, get your point *sheepish* that's what happens when you base one's philosphy on one book. but though the dictionary defines objectivity as 'uninfluenced by emotions or personal prejudices', Rand sure propagated living for a reason (and if that reason was total devotion to one thing, so be it)